Close

November 18, 2014

State Supreme Court Finds For Plaintiffs in Major School Funding Case

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Contact:
Michael A. Rebell
646-745-8288

STATE SUPREME COURT FINDS FOR PLAINTIFFS IN MAJOR SCHOOL FUNDING CASE

November 18, 2014 – New York, NY — Rejecting the state’s attempt to dismiss a major
litigation seeking to enforce the funding and other constitutional mandates established in the
landmark Campaign for Fiscal Equity v. State of New York litigation (“CFE”), Justice Manuel J.
Mendez of the New York State Supreme Court, New York County, issued an order today that
upholds the right of the plaintiffs in New Yorkers for Students’ Educational Rights (“NYSER”) to
proceed with their litigation against the state, and against Governor Andrew Cuomo and other
state defendants.

The NYSER litigation, filed earlier this year, alleges that in 2007, following the Court of
Appeals’ final decision in CFE, the governor and the state legislature enacted a major reform act
that committed the state to increasing funding for students in the New York City Public Schools
by approximately $5 billion per year, and for students in the rest of the state by approximately
$4 billion per year, all to be phased in over a four-year period. Since 2009, however, the state
has reneged on these commitments. Although the state has never repealed the 2007 legislation,
it has failed to fund schools in accordance with its foundation formula. Despite some increases
in state funding for education over the past few years, the state is still $5.6 billion short of the
amounts owed under that formula, according to the plaintiffs.

Referring specifically to some of the devices and mechanisms the state has used to
reduce its education appropriations, Justice Mendez held that “the ‘gap elimination
adjustment’…. the cap on state-aid increases, the supermajority requirements concerning
increases in local property tax levies,” together with penalty provisions imposed on New York
City students last year in connection with the implementation of the new teacher evaluation
system, all “could potentially be found irrational, arbitrary or capricious and capable of
preventing a sound basic education.”

The Court also held that, “The claims asserted by plaintiffs are not tenuous, there is a
potential risk of harm to public school students and to school districts derived from financial
distress.”

Justice Mendez also rejected the state’s claim that individual plaintiffs from all of the
approximately 700 school districts in the state would need to participate for plaintiffs to proceed
with this lawsuit and that NYSER as an organization lacked standing to sue. He held that “This
Court will not ‘close the courthouse doors’ on the individual plaintiffs’ potentially viable
constitutional claims affecting schoolchildren in New York State,” and that NYSER, whose
“stated mission is to ensure that all students in the State of New York receive the opportunity for
a sound basic education” also has standing.

The state now has 20 days to file an answer to the complaint, after which preparations
for trial can commence.

“We are pleased that the Court has quickly and definitively rejected the state’s motion to
dismiss, and we look forward to quickly moving this case along so that students throughout the
state can receive the educational opportunities that the state constitution clearly intends them to
enjoy,” said Douglas Schwarz, a partner at Bingham McCutchen, who serves as co-counsel for
the plaintiffs.

“We hope that this important decision will cause the governor and the legislature to
reconsider their current approach to funding for education and to work with us to promptly
ensure that all students truly receive the opportunity for a sound basic education. However, if
further litigation is necessary, we are prepared to continue to fight this case vigorously,” added
Michael A. Rebell, co-counsel for the NYSER plaintiffs (Rebell also served as co-counsel for
plaintiffs in the CFE litigation).

NYSER v. State of New York was filed earlier this year by 16 parents from New York
City and from urban, suburban and rural districts throughout the state, and by NYSER, an
organization whose members include the New York State School Boards Association, the New
York State Council of School Superintendents, the New York State PTA, the New York State
Association of School Business Officials, the Statewide School Finance Consortium, the Rural
Schools Association, 11 of New York City’s Community Education Councils, and a number of
parent groups and advocacy groups around the state. The plaintiffs are seeking immediate
financial relief, as well as the adoption of a series of mechanisms that will ensure adequate and
equitable funding for all students in New York State on a sustained, long-term basis. For more
information on the suit, see www.nyser.org

475 Riverside Drive, Suite 1373, New York, NY 10027 www.nyser.og Tel: 646-745-8288

Download the original press release here.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *